SITE ANNOUNCEMENT:

 

You are being redirected to the new version

 

 




PLA

 

Precision Lagless Average comparison screenshots

 

This product is now SUPERSEDED BY A NEW VERSION

Please click to view

 

 

 

 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v  Simple moving average(close,9) (Yellow line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval Simple

PLA has a lag reduction on the simple average on average of 2.66 bars per trend change and greater accuracy.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements. 5 bar improvement on first downtrend, 0 improvement on up trend change, 3 bar improvement on 2nd down trend. PLA clearly stays closer to the price action and signals earlier than the simple average.

The PLA Smoothness is also better.

 

 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v  Exponential moving average(close,9) (Yellow line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval Exponential

PLA has a lag reduction on the Exponential average on average of 3 bars per trend change and greater accuracy.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements. 6 bar improvement on first downtrend, 0 improvement on up trend change, 3 bar improvement on 2nd down trend. PLA clearly stays closer to the price action and signals earlier than the Exponential average.

Notably  the exponential suffers appalling whipsaw and changes several times with no real reason on the left side.

The PLA Smoothness is far greater than the exponential.

 
 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v   Weighted average(close,9) (Yellow line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval Weighted average

PLA has a lag reduction on the Exponential average on average of 1.33 bars per trend change and greater accuracy, and  smoothing.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements. 3 bar improvement on first downtrend, 0 improvement on up trend change, 0 bar improvement on 2nd down trend. PLA clearly stays closer to the price action and signals earlier than the Weighted average.

Notably  the weighted average is faster than the exponential and the simple, but smoothness suffers as a result of speed. More so noticeable in longer periods.

The PLA Smoothness is far greater than the weighted.

 

 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v  Adaptive average (close,9) (Blue line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval Adaptive average

PLA has a lag increase on the Adaptive moving average on average of -1 bars per trend change and greater accuracy. But the adaptive gave 5 extra fake signals of trend change, which effectively renders it un-useable.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements. 0 bar improvement on first downtrend, 0 improvement on up trend change, -3 bar improvement on 2nd down trend. PLA clearly stays closer to the price action and signals earlier than the adaptive average.

Notably  the adaptive average is faster than the PLA but with fake signals, and poor smoothing.

The PLA Smoothness is far greater than the adaptive average.

 

 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v  Triangular average (close,9) (Yellow line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval Triangular average

PLA has a lag reduction on the Triangular average on average of 2.66 bars per trend change and greater accuracy.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements. 4 bar improvement on first downtrend, 1 improvement on up trend change, 3 bar improvement on 2nd down trend. PLA clearly stays closer to the price action and signals earlier than the Triangular average.

Notably  the Triangular average is has very good smoothing, but low speed.

The PLA speed is far greater than the Triangular.

 

 

PLA(close,9) (Red line) v  Jurikes research JMA (close,9) (Blue line)

 
Verdict on 9 period sampling interval JMA average

PLA has a lag reduction on the JMA average on average of 0.33 bars per trend change.

Signals of each trend change show the following speed improvements.1 bar improvement on first downtrend, 0 improvement on up trend change, 0 bar improvement on 2nd down trend.

Notably  the JMA changed direction in the latter data while PLA stayed in short mode.

Due to numerous request to compare the PLA with the JMA more screenshots have been provided to show this.

 

                                                               <<Screenshots of  PLA v JMA >>

.
 

 

This product is now SUPERSEDED BY A NEW VERSION

 

Please click to view

 

 

 

 

RISK DISCLOSURE

 

  • Futures, Forex and Stock trading contain substantial risk and are not for every investor.

  • An investor could potentially lose all or more of the initial investment.

  • Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones financial security or lifestyle.

  • Only risk capital should be used for trading

  • Only those with sufficient risk capital should consider trading.

  • Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

 

 
 
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE

 

Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. no representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redirect issued 31st Jan 2020

 

site stats

Last updated